Healthy Jozi: A staged approach to better workplace food choices and chronic disease screening and linkage to care

Organisation: Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE2RO), Ezintsha, Washington University and University of Liverpool

 

 

Study objectives: The Healthy Jozi project aims to design and evaluate a comprehensive workplace-based programme that improves screening, linkage to care, and healthy food choices for employees in Johannesburg. The study will be conducted in two phases: 1) co-design interventions for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) screening and linkage to care, 2) evaluate these interventions in workplaces. The study integrates behavioural science, human-centred design, and implementation science to co-design person-centred interventions to address NCDs especially diabetes and hypertension at workplaces in the city of Johannesburg.

 

Phase 1 objectives are to: 

  1. Identify behavioural barriers and preferences related to screening, linkage to care, and healthy food choices in workplace programmes through contextual inquiry and discrete choice experiments
  2. Co-design, prototype, and develop an innovative workplace intervention package combining screening, linkage to care, and healthy food choice components

 

Phase 2 objectives are to:

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the integrated workplace intervention using a cluster-randomised trial focused on hypertension in Johannesburg workplaces
  2. Assess provider satisfaction with the referral process from the linkage programme
  3. Conduct an economic evaluation of the comprehensive workplace intervention package
  4. Disseminate successful innovations to key stakeholders, including medical insurers, occupational health programmes, and government implementers

 

 

Intervention description:

The Healthy Jozi intervention will be co-designed with employees, workplace managers, community organisations, and food suppliers. It may include:

  • Staged screening events for selected chronic diseases
  • Linkage-to-care support like referral information, SMS reminders, and navigation for those not linked
  • Healthy food choice components (behaviourally informed messaging, improved visibility of healthy options, and contextual education)
  • Prototyping will occur through multiple rounds in the Indlela B-Hub, ensuring interventions are acceptable and feasible before full rollout

 

 

Evaluation description:

Phase 1

Contextual inquiry on employee and manager preferences for screening, linkage, and food options:

  • 30 semi-structured interviews will be conducted with employees at workplaces
  • 4 focus group discussions will be conducted with managers at the workplaces
  • Discrete choice experiments will be conducted with employees and managers

 

Phase 2 

  • A factorial cluster-randomised trial across 52 workplaces
  • An economic evaluation will be conducted to determine the cost and cost-effectiveness of the intervention package

 

 

Study outcome:

Phase 1

  • Co-designed workplace intervention to be evaluated in Phase 2

 

Phase 2

Primary outcome:

  • Successful completion of the hypertension screening and linkage to care if indicated, among all employees at each workplace

 

Secondary outcomes:

  • Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility 
  • Cost per person screened and linked

 

 

Study site: Workplaces across Johannesburg

 

 

Target population: 

Inclusion criteria (employees and managers)

  • ≥18 years
  • Employed at a workplace in Johannesburg
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Willing to be contacted for follow-up

 

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Planning to relocate during the follow-up period (for screening participants)

 

 

Sample size & analysis: 

Phase 1:

  • 30 employees for SSIs
  • 4 FGDs (8-10 managers each)
  • 300 employees + 100 managers for DCEs

 

Phase 2:

  • ±2,600 employees across 52 workplaces in a factorial cluster-randomised trial

 

Analysis:

  • Qualitative data coded deductively & inductively
  • DCEs analysed using mixed logit models and latent class analysis
  • Trial outcomes analysed using mixed-effects logistic regression
  • Economic evaluation using provider-perspective costing

 

 

Duration: 27 months